The approval by the Food and Drug Administration of epidiolex (cannabidiol; CBD) for the treatment of severe seizure disorders has put this phytocannabinoid in the forefront of biomedical research. Other potential therapeutic applications of CBD supported by preclinical research, human studies, and anecdotal reports include pain, inflammation, and anxiety. CBD affects a diversity of pharmacological targets (e.g., 5-HT1a, GPR55, PPARỿ) as well as within the endocannabinoid system (FAAH inhibition, CB1 allosteric modulation). Although traditionally referred to as a non-psychoactive compound, vaporized CBD elicits “drug liking” and “pleasant” subjective effects in humans (Spindle et al. (2020) Drug Alcohol Depend, 211:107937, PMCID: PMC7414803). Here we used the drug discrimination paradigm to test: 1) whether mice could learn to discriminate CBD from vehicle; and 2) whether CBD behaves as a negative allosteric modulator of CB1 by eliciting a rightward shift of the generalization dose-response curve of the subjective effects of the high efficacy CB1 orthosteric agonist CP55,940. An initial experiment in food-restricted C57BL6/J male mice trained to nose-poke on a fixed-ratio of 10 (FR10) for food reinforcement found that CBD (30-100 mg/kg) did not produce rate suppression. Subsequently, a training dose of 100 mg/kg CBD was selected in which male C57BL/6J mice failed to reach training criteria (correct first food reinforcement (FFR), ≥ 80% treatment-associated responses) to discriminate from vehicle. Although these experiments showed that mice select the injection appropriate apparatus with an average of 80% or greater correct responding, the first food reinforcement (FFR) accuracy of each mouse was ~50%, suggesting that the drug’s subjective effects are not driving the operant responses. Therefore, on day 75 of training, we increased the dose of CBD to 200 mg/kg, with the aim to increase the FFR accuracy. Like the initial dose, CBD 200 mg/kg did not produce a reliable discriminative stimulus, determined by passing training criteria on 9 of 10 consecutive sessions. Current studies include testing whether CP55,940 produces a discriminative stimulus in these same subjects, and whether CBD (200 mg/kg) modulates the dose-response relationship of CP55,940 in a separate group of animals. In summary, mice did not learn to discriminate CBD from vehicle. Instead, they may have learned a win-stay or lose-shift strategy to receive food reinforcement that resulted in high performance during training sessions. However, altering training parameters (e.g., dose, route of administration, components of the operant task) may reveal a CBD discriminative stimulus. An outcome in which subjects learn to discriminate CBD from vehicle would provide a powerful in vivo approach to study both the pharmacology and underlying mechanisms of action of this drug.
This work supported by R01DA039942 and P30DA033934.